Talk:Jayden Bartels

There are absolutely zero reasons for this wiki page to exist
Wikipedia abuses its reputation by appeasing the fame machine. This article is a disgrace. I pray for Jayden Bartels and hope she finds peace and freedom from the modeling industry. 99.165.35.182 (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Elaborate? She appears to be a reasonably well known public figure within her circles. I have personally never heard of her but the article does well to show why she is notable. --Nz101 (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the page is well-justified. Notability is a key factor in Wikipedia, which means being famous plays a role. So, complaining about fame machine is not a good reason to delete a well sourced article about a notable person. — Starforce13  14:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No, this page is modeling industry spam. The "evidnece" that this person is famous is taken from "just trust me" formulas designed by website domain operators. There is no hard evidence that the website domain operators claiming various "viewer" or "subscriber" counts are reporting interaction statistics honestly. The modeling industry claims that some models are "famous" in order to support the careers of mediocre performers and artists. This is a game that is played when there is no fame involved at all, only claims that someone is famous with ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE OFFERED IN SUPPORT OF THESE DUBIOUS CLAIMS. If you think someone is "famous" when there is (1) no hard evidence to support this claim (2) good reason to think individuals associated with the subject would like to manipulate Wikipedia in order to create the impression of fame then guess what: IT LOOKS LIKE SOMEBODY IS ABUSING & VANDALIZING WIKIPEDIA. 99.165.35.182 (talk) 15:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Y'all are happy to nominate this article for deletion if you want. I'm not sure on notability (which is why I placed a flag on the article as possibly not meeting the guidelines; hoping to see if people respond and maybe add more info about her career) but Wikipedia isn't intended to be a fame machine. It may have that unintended consequence, but don't do the same thing that society did to the Illuminati and stray Wikipedia too far from its original messages/founding principles. InvadingInvader (talk) 08:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Outdated article
we say she is currently homeschooled.

She is now 20 and that is an outdated source. I an not sure we need to say that at all, but we need to stop saying it in the present tense.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)