Talk:Jess Fishlock/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 12:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

In the lead, note what league the Seattle Reign FC play in, and spell out what "FA WSL" is, or at least what the WSL refers to.

Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In Early life, you have "at age 16" and "at age sixteen;" stick with one, I think MOS suggests spelling out under 20 but consistency is the key.

Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiff City LFC has no citations.

Updated. Hmlarson (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First paragraph of the Bristol Academy section has no citation.

Updated. Hmlarson (talk) 22:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After mentioning the National Women's Soccer League, give the abbreviation for it.

Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Fishlock received a controversial red card..." is there any reason for the controversy? If so you should add it, if not it may not be necessary to note that.

Expanded Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 8–6–8 record is given the note explaining they're wins and losses, whereas a previous mention of a team record did not. Again, try to maintain consistency with that and either have all records linked like that, just the first mention, or none.

Updated Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any way to expand the coaching career section? This isn't an issue, just it would be good perhaps to include her record as a coach, or some detail like that, to make it a little more in depth.

Added a few more sentences. Hmlarson (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References: 9, 15, 18, 36, and 54 are all dead.

I ran broken link check and resolved all. The two left in the report (9 and 34) are working if you click on them. Hmlarson (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Once these are taken care of I'll give it another look, but should be good at that point.

Great it looks good now. Kaiser matias (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help Kaiser matias. Much appreciated. Hmlarson (talk) 01:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]