Talk:John Battersby Crompton Lamburn

Attn: Numealinesimpetar concerning Darwinism and John Crompton's works
I am sorry to say that I cannot accept some of your edits to this article as they stand, in particular those concerning Darwinism. If points such as your apparent ideas concerning punctuationism were in an article on Darwinism I would deal with them on their own merits. However, this article is on the subject of Lamburn's writings, and except at the most superficial level, your views and explications on the subject (or FTM, mine, or those of anyone else dealing with concepts more recent than 1950 or so!) are the sheerest red herrings and must be moved to another article or deleted. If you feel strongly enough on the subject, please reply (preferably in this discussion page) and we can discuss coming to some accommodation of our shared or respective views, and perhaps also discuss where the parts unacceptable in the article are to be presented instead. I hope you can respond quickly, but in case there are problems concerning the weekend, I shall wait till Monday evening (local to me) before acting without discussion to delete the parts I regard as unsuitable. In case you miss this note, I also am posting a copy in the discussion page of John Battersby Crompton Lamburn, where I hope you will respond. Cheers, JonRichfield (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)