Talk:John Bogdan

explanation
I reverted this edit -- which introduced the biased description "terrorist" for the individuals held in Guantanamo.

It is not our job to pick sides in a controversy. Torture apologists do try to convince others to call these men terrorists, even though that assertion is simply not supported for most of the individuals held there. That is why the USA never laid charges on more than a handful of the individuals. Geo Swan (talk) 06:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

NPOV
This article in its current state reads like a hit piece. It's basically little more than a bunch of dubious referenced allegations and a few basic details about person himself. Not to mention being a poster child for undo weight. James xeno (talk) 08:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

This entry has been edited further since November 16, 2019, and is quite solid in my opinion; indeed, somewhat above average or above Wiki standards for its sources, coherence, writing style, and so on. I don't think a reasonable person can object to anything about this entry in its current state. And it seems that the only objection came from "James xeno," who concluded his/her comment with an odd reference to "undo [sic] weight" and raised no specific problems. - Jan. 4, 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dixi-et-salvavi-animam-meam (talk • contribs) 12:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)