Talk:John Chinaman

Cartoon
Could someone add further elaboration on the cartoon that's on the page? The text in it is barely readable, and some context would be nice as well. --LostLeviathan 22:24, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Done (& worth the wait, I hope). Ewulp (talk) 23:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Chinaman or Confucius
I'm "Confuced". Do these refer to the same depiction, or is the latter a more benign version of the former? Clarityfiend (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * They are two slightly different characters, and you're right that the article wasn't very clear about this. Nast drew both characters at various times; I've done some rewriting to clarify that he didn't invent John Chinaman, who was already a familiar figure by the time Nast started publishing his work. Ewulp (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That's much better. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Chinaman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070925174716/http://www.thecore.nus.edu.sg/victorian/periodicals/punch/35.html to http://www.thecore.nus.edu.sg/victorian/periodicals/punch/35.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)