Talk:John Komlos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

American economic historian ?[edit]

He is born in Hungary, and is currently in Munich, perhaps "American educated economic historian" is a better was to put it.Geo8rge (talk) 04:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Komlos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality and reliability of sources[edit]

I don't see any reason for the comment critiquing sources information. They include the NYTimes, The New Yorker magazine, NPR, the Princeton U Press, economics journals and, if you go to the sources, comments within from noted economists. None seem to fit the critical characterization. Also Google translations of the Hungarian. A reading of them by my Hungarian-reading daughter-in-law) confirms that the Hungarian language sources are credible and independent of the page subject.

Perhaps this old note should be removed?

If not, suggestions for what the editors feel is still needed? Davidcay (talk) 14:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]