Talk:John Nagl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

header}}

Platoon Leader[edit]

The article stated that Nagl had been a platoon commander. I changed to platoon leader, which is the correct US Army terminology. CsikosLo (talk) 12:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update?[edit]

Look, this biography of John Nagl is not objective. Whoever wrote it, wrote it with Nagl's book in mind and his flawed theory on how military organizations learn in war. I have intimate knowledge with the issues involved. It is not a factually correct statement in the bio that suggests Nagl has had huge influence over junior officers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.152.83.69 (talk) 01:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slate.com has written a series of articles the top layer which can be found here:

http://www.slate.com/id/2206041/?from=rss

basically, the point is made that the current defense secretary, Gates, was on board with Lt. Col. Nagl, and indeed, Nagl worked with Gen. Petraeus on the recently completed U.S. Army Counterinsurgency Field Manual. Defense Secretary Robert Gates was unhappy to lose Nagl and Slate.com reports that he is back in the Pentagon at the behest of Sec. Gates. Additionally, and unusually, command leaders in the combat field (Iraq), including Gen. Petraeus, and three or four other lower ranking but commanding officers in Iraq were brought back to the US to serve on a promotion board to determine who gets promoted from Col. to brigadier general. The bottom line is the none of the names that appear in this article are on the July 2008 promotion list, which may be found here:

http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=12069

Can anyone shed any light on this and, at the very least, confirm and update Nagl current position in the Pentagon, if any. It seems like an important point in an article about an Army colonel who resigned more or less in protest and then was brought back in by the Secretary of Defense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.20.188.224 (talk) 23:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:John Nagl/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

"near the top of" regarding his time at West Point...seems too open...if he got the top 5%, state it.06:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 06:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 20:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on John Nagl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on John Nagl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]