Talk:Johnson & Johnson Vision

Biased
Anybody else feel that this article is more of an advertisement than an article. It seems a little biased to me. A Short Story 10:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

UTC, A little biased? The entry is pure BS. AMO has blinded at least 6 people, some of them likely due to refusing to recall the product after they knew it was infecting customers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.173.177 (talk) 04:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I completely agree -- this HAD to be written by one of their marketing/PR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.160.66.142 (talk) 21:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

There's no way this should be allowed to stay as it is. It's about as far from NPOV as you can get without a snappy tagline and a celebrity endorsement. Bumblesnug (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Abbott Medical Optics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507010151/http://ocbiz.freedomblogging.com:80/category/biomedical/advanced-medical-optics/ to http://ocbiz.freedomblogging.com/category/biomedical/advanced-medical-optics/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)