Talk:Juan Gómez-Quiñones

Deleted criticism section
The content may have some legitimacy. Here is a reliable source:

Brangifer (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * http://articles.latimes.com/1991-01-09/local/me-7191_1_chicano-studies/2
 * Yeah, I removed it due to the sourcing situation in the article. With a reliable source, we will have to consider whether this is important enough for inclusion; and if so, present it in a neutral manner, including Gomez-Quinones's view of the situation. Based on the one source you provided, I can't immediately see that this is something that should be included, but I don't have any definitive position, as I don't know the wider story and context. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 23:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree on all points. I have no particular burden about this matter, but people who make legal threats over actual events documented in RS not only irk me, their threats should be shown to be ineffectual and counterproductive. The Streisand effect can be pretty powerful! Wikipedia will not be threatened into silence or self-censorship. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)