Talk:Juicer

WPFood assessment
Low importance C-Class article on a common kitchen implement. --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 01:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

A section on slowjuicers should be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.132.163.55 (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Ridiculous pseudo-scientific claims
I'd like to see this Wikipedia article extended to include a paraghraph refering one by one to the claims that different types of juicers have dramatically different health impact. There's an entire industry booming right now built around an idea that the levels of health-related compounds vary significantly depending on the extraction method. Seems somewhat reasonable but how big are those differences really? One youtuber for instance has been selling juicers on the internet and maintains that 'according to scientists' a juicer is better at killing cancer cells than a blender. He never provided the actual study though. Youtube is flooded with videos by fishy and highly ceffeinated juicer salesmen convincing their viewers that one needs to buy a $400 juicer in order to get rid off the 'evil' dietary fiber and stay healthy. It's time to put their silly marketing tactics into scientific perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:115F:B32:1E00:699C:CFFF:32E0:3BEC (talk) 20:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)