Talk:IJustine/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the I-phone bill section, the last sentence seems out of place. I'm not sure what the phone automatically updating had to do with e-billing, which is what is being discussed in the previous sentence. Can you clarify...
     • How is it now?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
   • In the last picture of the article, the caption is "Ezarik wears new glasses at Podcamp AZ (2008-11-02)" Are these part of the new equipment provided by AT&T? If so, could you clarify this in the caption, because as it stands it makes it sound like the article believes it's notable that she got new eyeglasses...
     • It is just a different perspective of her with glasses.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
   • Please make sure that all of the references are formatted the same. Most currently use templates, but there are a couple that don't.
     • I found 3.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • There are a couple of prose issues that I would like to see fixed before I promote the article, but overall a very nice job! Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 02:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

   • Everything looks good now, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)