Talk:Kaiser Tufail

Self published
Please do not remove the self published blog sources by the author as they are justified by WP:SPS and WP:ABOUTSELF. Self published sources can source statements which are about the subject itself, in this case some details and the articles that were published by the author. The author is also an expert in the field so it is also justified by the other criteria as self published sources by experts are reliable sources. -- lTopGunl (talk) 10:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Failed verification
None of the sources in the lede verify that this guy is an historian, TG, given that we have been discussing this guy for the last few days please do not accuse me of hounding, it are obvious I would take a look at this article given the discussion on him. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * No, we have not been discussing the guy for days. You follow me to one article and then follow me to this one which I created. I think after the ArbCom warning you should stay away from my edits as I have been doing the same. And do not Tagbomb the lede. Works as historian are covered in article. -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have not followed you at all, and given you have not touched this article in a year it is not even remotely close to hounding, get over it and stop with the accusations all the time. The fact that you edit war out FV tags is highly disruptive, not one of those sources say he is a historian or that he is known for his "unbiased coverage of the Indo-Pakistani Wars" You should not remove FV tags at all unless you have citations to cover the content. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I created the article, which makes enough evidence of hounding. FV tags are not for you to put. I would disagree with you on those any way if you were not here to question any edit I made on wiki. -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * For just once stop going on about me and discuss the content as I am, the sources used do not support the content, one book published does not make one a historian, the guy has no academic qualifications as an historian that I can see. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you see a list of defence journal publications? And yes it is about you... I can not pretend to be ok with content edits where they are made constantly just because I made them or more of had something to do with them so that you can further edit into the article later without 'openly' following. -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Opinion pieces written in DJ do not an historian make, I will give it a few days, unless sources are found I will remove that content per BLP. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * One thing further, I do not look at the article history before editing it, why would I? I had no idea you had even edited the damn thing before. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kaiser Tufail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927040737/http://www.defencejournal.com/2001/september/alam.htm to http://www.defencejournal.com/2001/september/alam.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070319114802/http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/spedition/defence_day_supp_05/p5.html to http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/spedition/defence_day_supp_05/p5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)