Talk:Kandalanu

What does this mean?
"Examples as Tiglath-Pileser III (reigning over Babylon as "Pulu") and his son Shalmaneser V (reigning over Babylon as "Ululayu") are not based on authentic and official evidence"

I don't understand what the article is saying, and to the extent that I do understand, it seems to contradict my previous understanding which is, indeed, that Tiglath-Pileser III reigned over Babylon as "Pulu" and Shalmaneser V did so as "Ululayu." If that's not true, why is that a thing people say? The article is elliptical and confusing. john k (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Although they are often said to have been, there is no contemporary hard evidence that "Pulu" and "Ululayu" were used as regnal names. Ichthyovenator (talk) 12:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)