Talk:Kentuckians for the Commonwealth

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 12 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ryanrussell02.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 2 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lippardcc.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Opposition to KFTC
It appears the article omits opposition to KFTC by the coal industry. It appears that this article is NOT neutral. Comments??? Willking1979 (talk) 01:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It appears that any reasonable person could gather from the description and mission statement that KFTC is in conflict with large corporations, perhaps coal companies. However, it is clear that the article -- or stub, rather -- is so minimal that it does not even state that one of KFTC's many campaigns is directed against the coal industry.  Given this clarity, rather than claim non-neutrality of a stub, it would contribute much more to detail the interactions between citizens working on behalf of Kentuckians for the Commonwealth and those corporate executives bent on safeguarding their economic interests.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.49.232 (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I have to agree with the anonymous commentator. This is a stub article that briefly summarizes the beliefs and goals of the organization.  As a political/social activist group, it seems very obvious that there would be organizations on the other side of their issues.  Since the article doesn't even really mention anything about their involvement with issues surrounding coal mining, it would be POV to make any real issue of their opposition by that specific industry at this time.  --Wingsandsword (talk) 04:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 21:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Added expansion of significant accomplishments and importance of KFTC Lippardcc (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)