Talk:Khải Định

Untitled
doesn't sound all that neutral ... "In a manner fitting for a traitor, that is cowardly," etc.
 * Unfortunately many of these articles seem to have been devastated by Vietnamese monarchists (or maybe just one) with an agenda to make the royals look as good as possible and the communists as bad as possible. Everyking 03:49, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rumors
There have been rumors that Bao Dai wasn't his child at all, but an adopted child. Khai Dinh was rumored to be either impotent or homosexual, as he wore flamboyant clothes, preferred to be in the company of men more than women, and when he watches hat tuong, he made the men take the role of women. DHN (talk) 02:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

啟定 or 啓定 ?
On the coins it was 啓定



Pyvanet (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Minh Mang which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khải Định. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041022204738/http://www.vietscape.com/travel/hue/khaidinh.html to http://www.vietscape.com/travel/hue/khaidinh.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Better/ more sources for LGBT categories etc
Given he's listed under three LGBT categories, and the only given source is a (now-dead but viewable archived) news site of unclear quality, shouldn't there be more added? Per the evident facts, he was married, and had a son who succeeded him. There must be books, scholarly research, etc, regarding whether or not he was homosexual, surely? If so, they want including, if not, maybe the categorization is precipitate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.200.175 (talk) 01:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)