Talk:Khachatur Abovian/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I can tell this article was carefully put together. It is certainly acceptable as a Good Article. If you consider trying Feature Articles, please solicit a copyedit beforehand. --maclean 19:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1. Well written. I made a few copyedit changes, mostly removing excess words or adding commas. Two sentences stuck out though:
 * "was transferred to the same post in Yerevan where he also encountered apathy and antagonism.[13]" - unclear what 'post' is referring to, and where did the 'apathy and antagonism' come from?
 * "which had a strong influence wide layers of Armenian society" - unclear wording

2. Factually accurate and verifiable - references look good and properly used via inline citations. 3. Broad in its coverage - covers major aspects of his life and works. 4. Neutral - yes. 5. Stable - yes. 6. Illustrated appropriately - all images are relevant and properly licensed.
 * Thank you for the prompt review. I addressed the issues you raised within the prose.--  Ευπάτωρ   Talk!! 20:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)