Talk:Kiix-in

Possible move to "Keeshan"
I know in BC Wikipedia we often stay with native spellings, e.g. Xa:ytem Rock, but wondering about this one; it's often (I think) linked as Keeshan....but the Nat'l Historic Site info uses the Nuu-cha-nulth "Kiix?in". Thoughts?Skookum1 (talk) 07:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 24 January 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move to Kiix-in, per consensus (non-admin closure) . ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 23:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Kiix?in → Kiixʔin – “Kiixʔin” is the Nuu-chah-nulth spelling for the name (see Huuayaht.org or on Google) using the Nuu-chah-nulth alphabet  with the letter ʔ instead of the question mark. The letter ʔ happens to be in MediaWiki:Titleblacklist, so I cannot do the renaming myself. Moyogo/ (talk) 11:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Kiix-in per this. This seems to be the way it's usually rendered when writing in English. Wikipedia titles shouldn't use non-standard characters when alternatives are available.--Cúchullain t/ c 16:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Kiix-in per Cúchullain and WP:COMMONNAME. Jenks24 (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Kiix-in per Cúchullain and WP:COMMONNAME. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.