Talk:Kingston Lacy

Another source...

 * I found this article on Jstor which might be useful for this article (I don't want to start playing with the article while its going for "Good Article" and mess it up!)
 * Also, there appears to be a bibliography missing.

Pedantic image quibble
Could/should the two red character date stamps, on two of the images in the gallery, be removed somehow? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree they are a bit unsightly but am unsure how to go about removing them. There may be other images we could substitute for them. Feel free to do what you like. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * As images go, I think they're pretty good. I'm sure a few minutes with PaintShop Pro would render something more acceptable. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You could try making a request at Graphics Lab/Photography workshop.--Ykraps (talk) 23:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I found there is a backlog at the Photography Workshop and plenty of alternative images at Commons so I have substituted two images in the gallery. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * That's probably for the best then. I only mentioned it because I requested a date stamp removed from one of my images and found it to be most satisfactory.--Ykraps (talk) 09:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Lol. I won't bother doing a quick and dirty clean up with Paint then! But those images are probably better. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

George Bankes
I think this is the one - not a Canon.

Gallery error
it's not showing the newly added picture in full presentation mode Wentwort12 (talk) 08:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

National Trust pilot 2
Hello! As part of this National Trust pilot project, a small number of images have been released to Commons, including relevant to Kingston Lacy. If you have comments on this please add them to the project talk page. Thank you! Lajmmoore (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Gallery
When this article was promoted to GA, the Gallery had four images,. That number has now tripled, with the addition of eight extra, large, images. I understand the tendency of some editors to continually add images, but Wikipedia isn't Instagram. Images which illustrate points in the text are great, but indiscriminate groups of images don't improve articles. I'm proposing to trim shortly. Very happy to discuss, of course. KJP1 (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I think the images are all wonderful and really make the article sparkle. They really are high quality. As they are placed low in the article body, no reader who is interested only in the history/ architecture is obliged to see them. If there are images of features not described in the text, I'd be tempted to add text, instead of removing the images. Let's see what other editors have to say. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)