Talk:Kirk Jarvinen

Fair use rationale for Image:Jarvinen Aquaman.jpg
Image:Jarvinen Aquaman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kirk Jarvinen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204114133/http://glcorps.dcuguide.com/profile.php?name=torquemada to http://glcorps.dcuguide.com/profile.php?name=torquemada

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

PROD removal
PROD concern stated as "Can't find anything that would establish notability :(" I have found and added one source with significant coverage, and some others that verify information. Removing PROD as it's nearly expired, and it's possible that other SIGCOV could be found. RebeccaGreen (talk) 03:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks much better, thank you :) Joe (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)