Talk:Kistler K-1

Other Concepts
I removed a section by this name consisting of this text:

"Kistler Aerospace also had another concept. A rocket-powered quadcopter, the second stage of the rocket would closely reassembled to Delta Clipper. Unlike the original concept, it would land by rocket engines rather than parachutes and airbags."

I'm not sure what this means, but it isn't sourced, Google doesn't seem to know about it, and the concept doesn't even seem likely. Maybe someone confused Kistler with the contemporary Rotary Rocket effort. 2601:647:4400:4727:C89A:9BC:8C41:32D5 (talk) 04:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I found the information from the YouTuber Scott Manley. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 06:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

How many times reusable
Planned for 100 reuses. - Did this include the engines too ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 19 January 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition, and name is used in the sources  &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

K-1 (rocket) → Kistler K-1 – The current article title sounds weird, isn't it? Therefore, I suggest to rename it "Kistler K-1" à la SpaceX Starship. Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 05:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting.  CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  13:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.