Talk:Kit Carson/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Kit Carson
This article is based on the most current materials by distinguished scholars and historians available on the subject. I cannot understand why it would fail GA status. True, the article has been plagued by a self-appointed watchdog who has nothing more to do than damn articles he doesn't like. These damnations are not based on verifiable research but on this watchdog's own biases. The article must move forward to GA status. SeeSpot Run (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)