Talk:Kraków/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Initial comments
My initial impressions, after skim-reading this article a couple of times, is that: it's comprehensive, wide-ranging and well referenced. I don't yet see anything obvious missing. So, it appears to be GA material.

I'm now going to be spending the next few days going through the article. I will be going through it section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Depending on what I find, I may only post corrective actions; but we will have a wait and see. Pyrotec (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)