Talk:Kurganets-25

http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/1954916?page=3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.104.200.95 (talk) 10:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kurganets-25. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150514122922/http://www.military-informant.com/army/bmp/8846-kurganets-25-ob-ekt-695-boevaya-mashina-pekhoty.html to http://www.military-informant.com/army/bmp/8846-kurganets-25-ob-ekt-695-boevaya-mashina-pekhoty.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150503222407/http://www.armyrecognition.com/russia_russian_army_light_armoured_vehicle_uk/kurganets-25_kurganets_aifv_armoured_infantry_fighting_vehicle_technical_data_sheet_pictures_video.html to http://www.armyrecognition.com/russia_russian_army_light_armoured_vehicle_uk/kurganets-25_kurganets_aifv_armoured_infantry_fighting_vehicle_technical_data_sheet_pictures_video.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

According to whom?
Datasheets? Not that an comparison between M2 and BMP-3 is really necessary in this article, but for the sake of argument: the M2 is outgunned, overweight, arguably less mobile (heavier, but more power, so maybe a tie, but overall we have to consider the amphibious performance of the two), has an much broader silhouette and shorter range. Maybe a slight adavantage in fire control and protection for the M2, but if they ever meet 1 vs. 1 both are capable of destroying their oppenent. Crew compartment? No real advantage, both cramped. , Markscheider (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)


 * With M2 vs. BMP-3, while the M2 has one or two advantages, most sources seem to consider the BMP-3’s advantages in survivability, firepower, mobility, etc. to be significant.
 * As far as BMP-3 vs. Warrior, unquestionably the former trounces the latter overall. The Warrior was doctrinally intended to be a battle taxi with an autocannon.
 * Still, the claim should be sourced to something better than, say, Quora 😏 RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 01:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)