Talk:LGBT rights in the Gambia

RfC: The Gambia or the Gambia
There is currently a request for comments at Talk:The Gambia on whether to capitalize the definite article in the country name. Feel free to participate in the discussion. Jafeluv (talk) 05:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

RFC on LGBT rights in Africa
Editors are invited to participate in an RFC concerning this article at Talk:LGBT rights under international law. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on LGBT rights in the Gambia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130103000632/http://www.volkerbeck.de/cms/files/16_3597_minor_interpellation.pdf to http://www.volkerbeck.de/cms/files/16_3597_minor_interpellation.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120611181908/http://old.ilga.org/Statehomophobia/ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2012.pdf to http://old.ilga.org/Statehomophobia/ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2012.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221193017/http://adoption.state.gov/country_information/country_specific_info.php?country-select=gambia to http://adoption.state.gov/country_information/country_specific_info.php?country-select=gambia
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719164423/http://observer.gm/africa/gambia/article/2008/5/19/no-room-for-gays-in-gambia to http://observer.gm/africa/gambia/article/2008/5/19/no-room-for-gays-in-gambia
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130123113403/http://www.freedomnewspaper.com/Homepage/tabid/36/mid/367/newsid367/4714/Breaking-News-Gambia-Jammeh-Threatens-To-Sack-Gay-And-Lesbian-Soldiers-In-Gambia/Default.aspx to http://www.freedomnewspaper.com/Homepage/tabid/36/mid/367/newsid367/4714/Breaking-News-Gambia-Jammeh-Threatens-To-Sack-Gay-And-Lesbian-Soldiers-In-Gambia/Default.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120726154625/http://observer.gm/africa/article/dutch-home-sexual-fined-d100000-says-he-has-no-means-to-pay to http://observer.gm/africa/article/dutch-home-sexual-fined-d100000-says-he-has-no-means-to-pay
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625105126/http://jollofnews.com/20120411arrested-gambian-gays-remanded.html to http://www.jollofnews.com/20120411arrested-gambian-gays-remanded.html
 * Added tag to http://www.jollofnews.com/20120801gambian-court-frees-alleged-homosexuals.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:13, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet edits since 2014: "Vigilante execution"
There has been a persistent and prolonged effort to introduce variations on "vigilante torture, beatings and vigilante executions" into the penalty parameters of the article's infobox and summary table; unsourced changes to the maximum penalty are also made. In common with many other LGBT rights in [Country] articles, sockpuppets of the blocked user Jacobkennedy (SPI page) and associated IP users have placed unsourced, poorly sourced, and WP:SYNTH material: Recording this here for a couple of reasons: My hope is that this post will assist with noting and handling any future similar changes. AukusRuckus (talk) 11:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2014: IP 64.121.83.151 changed penalties to include "up to death"
 * 2020: IP 194.247.60.2 added "or vigilante torture, beatings and death" to infobox; and "Penalty: Up to life imprisonment" to table
 * 2021: IP 64.121.83.151 re-inserted "or vigilante torture, beatings and death" to the summary table, which had been removed −from the table only− in December 2020, maintaining the edit made in 2020
 * 2022: Lmharding once again adds "vigilante torture, beatings and vigilante executions" to table. (Had been removed from table −but never deleted from infobox− immediatley after previous, 2021, insertion.)
 * 1) User likely to be back to add similar material: they have been making such edits for . On this article it's relatively few, on others there are a huge number
 * 2) On some of these low-traffic pages particularly, it seems that such unsourced changes are less likely to be caught and are sometimes only partially reverted. The quality of the article slowly degrades over time