Talk:Lactobacillus helveticus

There are several contradictory results to the first article. I will add two of the most relevant ones as a contradiction. However, it should be understood that those (contradictory) experiments have been done in a very different way, with a fixed quantity of active substance, that seem lower than in first pro article. The two contradictory articleas are:   There is an more recent article here: 

(Am J Clin Nutr 89: 617-623, 2009. First published December 23, 2008; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26918 )

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahibadkaret (talk • contribs) 09:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lactobacillus helveticus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080413120913/http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/24/4/257 to http://www.jacn.org/cgi/content/full/24/4/257

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)