Talk:Lake Street Elevated

Subsection of Morgan station
I think I might take the subsection of the Morgan station and put it into the Service section. ChicagoWiz 01:34, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Lake Street Elevated (CTA). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091003102712/http://www.chicagotribune.com:80/news/local/chicago/chi-morgan-street-el-city-zone-3sep30,0,3277050.story to http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chicago/chi-morgan-street-el-city-zone-3sep30,0,3277050.story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 07:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Street Elevated (CTA). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120623124844/http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/cdot/provdrs/transit_facilities/svcs/morgan_cta_greenpinklinestation.html to http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/cdot/provdrs/transit_facilities/svcs/morgan_cta_greenpinklinestation.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

No need for two articles
Yes, the article at Lake Street Elevated Railroad is about the operator, whereas this is the article on the physical railroad which is still in use as part of the "L", but the operator can sufficiently be covered here, I think, as it really didn't have much notability independent of the branch which still bears its name. I think a merge might be in order. oknazevad (talk) 18:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)