Talk:Laksam Upazila

nabab bari
NABAB FAIZURNESSA one of the great women in bangla histroy also in laksam. His famous home known as NOBAB BARI. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.69.210.2 (talk) 06:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Laksham_Upazila. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Rubbish computer (talk) 21:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose that Laksam Railway Junction be merged into Laksam Upazila. The junction station is already covered in the upazila article. Any additional station information for which a source can be established can easily be explained in the context of transport in the upazila. The upazila article is of a reasonable size so that expanding the station information in it will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.

Unless the station stub, which is completely unreferenced, is either merged or improved to the point where it satisfies the notability guidelines, it is in danger of being deleted. Worldbruce (talk) 07:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Although these two articles size is very tiny but laksam upazilla and Laksam railway junction are quiet two different things. These two articles should be expanded not merged. fe rdo us  ''' (Chat!) 18:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm not suggesting that the upazila and junction are the same thing, or that the articles aren't large enough.
 * Wikipedia has notability guidelines for determining whether a topic should have its own article. The most fundamental is the general notability guideline, which says that an article is justified if there is significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent, secondary sources. If there is no such coverage, "it should not have a separate article."
 * It would be wonderful if Laksam Railway Junction could meet the notability inclusion criteria and be expanded, but so far no sources have been identified, let alone multiple, reliable, independent, secondary ones containing significant coverage. Another solution would be to delete Laksam Railway Junction. If nominated, it would likely be deleted at the end of 7 days unless advocates of keeping it could produce solid sources (see Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions). A third solution, and the one I prefer, would be to merge the junction into another article. A junction or station is usually merged into the article on the company operating the railway line or the geographic place where it is located.
 * Merging has the advantages of preserving all content and leaving behind a redirect. With the redirect, if anyone searches for Laksam Railway Junction they will be taken to information about it in the surviving article. If at some later date sufficient appropriate sources are found, the topic can easily be split off into its own article again. Worldbruce (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Works
I am a Cyber Army Of Bangladesh ImtiazHossainNihal (talk) 07:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Zilla
Cumilla ImtiazHossainNihal (talk) 07:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Village
Bizra ImtiazHossainNihal (talk) 07:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Read In..
Inter 2nd Year ImtiazHossainNihal (talk) 07:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Works
Flim Actor && Youtuber ImtiazHossainNihal (talk) 07:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Outside works
Buisness ImtiazHossainNihal (talk) 07:07, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://laksam.comilla.gov.bd/site/page/20bf14f3-2144-11e7-8f57-286ed488c766 http://laksam.comilla.gov.bd/site/page/20bf4f1a-2144-11e7-8f57-286ed488c766 http://laksam.comilla.gov.bd/site/page/20bf237b-2144-11e7-8f57-286ed488c766. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 06:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Laksam Nawab Bari.jpg