Talk:Laser-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

= Neutrality? =

Interesting, informative, BUT: the article seems to be nothing else but a condensed scientific paper. The style doesn't suit wikipedias criteria for clearity. Examples: "he laser-based ARPES undoubtedly is an ideal candidate ..." or "In addition, the lower costs for operating and higher photon flux make laser-based ARPES easier to be handled". This is a wikipedian article, not a scientific funding request for this kind of ARPES. --77.191.238.254 (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Figure where?
The article seems a copy paste more than an original article, it refers to a figure 1 which is totally missing and seems something that you would find in an article. Viriale (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)