A fact from Le Sommeil appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Of course we all have different understandings of what is erotic, but to me, this is not "highly erotic" as the article referenced says. Maybe "the importance of the lesbian motif in nineteenth-century art, literature and popular erotica" should be used as a clarification of what justifies its category as such?
The text currently reads: "The painting shows two naked women lying asleep on a bed entwined in an erotic embrace, resting after sexual intercourse." That they are entwined is obviously true; that they are resting after intercourse is obviously conjecture, and is not supported by the quoted reference. I have deleted the second portion of the sentence. Cross Reference (talk) 17:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
