Talk:Leeds University Library's Cookery Collection

Conflict of Interest
If any users would like to discuss with me any potential problems caused by my conflict of interest, then I am happy to do so. I have tried to edit without bias and comply with Wikipedia guidelines at all times. I have a full declaration on my user page which explains that I am contributing towards the Wikimedia initiative GLAM. Please contact me at my talk page. Imogen at Leeds Uni Library (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a valuable article and you have edited it carefully and objectively. Congratulations on having it accepted at AfC! Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Project Library
I agree with the B class rating for the most part. Some constructive criticism: The lead needs some more citations and fewer 1-2 sentence paragraphs. You have a ton references throughout the rest of the article, the lead should reflect the rest of the page and therefore you can easily bring more information into it. The history section need some work - there are a lot of subsections, which is fine, but the overview is only one sentence long. I'd like to see these expanded if possible. I think the rest of the article from there down is superb, granted I haven't done a comprehensive review of all references.