Talk:Leeson Street

Revert
Care to explain, Sarah?

Lapsed Pacifist 09:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I removed some political POV about Shell. Why is that a problem? Regards (Sarah777 12:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC))

Removing political POV wouldn't be a problem. What you did was blank a mention of what is now a regular occurrence on Leeson Street, along with the reasons behind it. Do you doubt there are protests? Do you disagree with my interpretation of the motivation of the protesters? You also reintroduced dodgy grammar and wording. Ombudsman is not plural. Saying the pubs are present implies they may sometimes be absent. Please rectify this.

Lapsed Pacifist 14:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Reverting involves going back to the earlier version. If you want to correct the grammar, go ahead. I've no idea whether there are protests or not, never noticed any and I regularly pass through Leeson Street. Can you supply any references; any evidence that these protests are now a regular feature of Leeson Street?
 * I have come across you somewhere before...was it on Talk:British Isles?

(Sarah777 17:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC))

See, , , , , , , , ,. I don't remember you.

Lapsed Pacifist 11:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

OK. If you put the stuff about the protests back with some references I'll not revert again. Obviously we haven't crossed paths before; you'd not forget me! (Sarah777 12:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC))