Talk:Legalise Cannabis Australia

Party website
I'm not sure which is the most relevant and the most official website to go with for the infobox. Here are the three I've found:


 * https://legalisecannabis.org.au/
 * https://hemp.org.au/
 * http://australianhempparty.com/ (Update - older page, no longer being considered)

Number two and three appear similar but have subtle differences and are not the same. Please give your reasoning for which you think we should use below. Thank you. Helper201 (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Update, upon more closely reading australianhempparty.com/, this is the older page, which then moved to hemp.org.au. We can either keep both of these two pages (number 1 and 2, which may be my preferred option), or decide between them. Again, please leave your thoughts and reasoning below. Thanks. Helper201 (talk) 03:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Update - I found this website as well - legalise.org.au/, not sure why it seems to exist as a homepage when it’s very similar to the first link I posted in my original post. Another we should consider. Helper201 (talk) 03:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

suggestion to move vote on vaccine mandates to individual members articles
its pretty standard for positions of individual members to be on their wiki page and not the parties page, it's not significantly relevant to the article and if all individual members various positions on different issues are included on the party page it risks becoming cluttered and reducing the quality of the article Politically Minded Stoner (talk) 06:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * , I agree. It’s not something that I have found any evidence to support that the party holds any positions whatsoever on vaccines or vaccine mandates. Its policies and positions simply seem to be only those related cannabis and other related matters. Its candidates and politicians I think can generally hold their own views on other non cannabis related matters such as this. This is simply them exercising their own personal/individual views on a matter unrelated to cannabis or the party. Helper201 (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

The fact that the party's only two MPs voted in favour of a position makes it a party stance not an individual stance. GeebaKhap (talk) 08:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

how so?, all that shows is that is the stance of their only currently elected MPs, the LCWA party constitution states that Adoption of policies will be by ordinary vote of Members at a General Meeting, LCA and LCWA have no policy on vaccines or vaccine mandates, the party has no stance on vaccine mandates, thus its elected members can vote however they want Politically Minded Stoner (talk) 01:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)