Talk:Lena Dunham/Archives/2017/May

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lena Dunham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150215095534/http://gawker.com/5991066/how-david-carr-became-the-daddy-of-girls to http://gawker.com/5991066/how-david-carr-became-the-daddy-of-girls
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160419143831/http://gawker.com/5903468/a-girls-writers-ironic-racism-and-other-white-people-problems to http://gawker.com/5903468/a-girls-writers-ironic-racism-and-other-white-people-problems

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

'sans' Photoshop?
'On January 3, 2017, she praised Glamour for featuring her with bare legs on their February 2017 cover - sans Photoshop - meaning that her cellulite on her thighs is visible'

I think the phrase you're looking for is 'without the use of' instead of 'sans', which is pretentious and silly. Can someone fix? --82.1.56.56 (talk) 17:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

I don't think using "sans" in place of four words and something like 18 total characters when it literally means "without" is pretentious and silly at all. In fact, I think a suggested edit replacing sans WITH "without the use of" would be a better example of pretentious and silly editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.234.100.60 (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)