Talk:Let Bartlet Be Bartlet

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Television: Episode coverage / The West Wing Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the West Wing task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Clean up the page intro?[edit]

Does anyone agree the intro blurb to this page could use a LOT of cleaning up? For example it says in it that 'a memo is leaked attacking the fictional President Of The United States'. For starters, this is a page about a TV show episode, so yea...duh... of course the President character in a fictional TV show is himself fictional. And even on top of that, the way it reads is that a staffer writes a memo, not about Bartlett, but about someone President she's made up. Also why does it mention who wrote the article like a newspaper column? 'A Senior White House Advisor', why not just say the name of the character who does it? Also, why does the info bar list the guest stars but not the characters they play?

If you are looking for something to do[edit]

If you are looking for something to do, the article still can be expanded. There's info in book reliable sources that can be added to the artice. If you add info from books to the article, you might be able to raise the article quality scale from C to B. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also these (from the deletion discussion)

Mcewan (talk) 13:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD 2012-07-16[edit]

Since this article was nominated for deletion ('Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let Bartlet Be Bartlet'), edits have been performed making it much clearer why this episode is arguably notable. The AfD was closed as "no consensus" with the comment, "the best way forward would be to either start a merge discussion on the talk page of the article, or perhaps an RfC to settle the issue". I believe neither is necessary, but I also wanted Talk to note that. --→gab 24dot grab← 18:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Let Bartlet Be Bartlet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526034219/http://epguides.com/WestWing/ to http://epguides.com/WestWing/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Let Bartlet Be Bartlet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515001052/http://archives.vigile.net/ds-actu/docs4/4-14.html to http://archives.vigile.net/ds-actu/docs4/4-14.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]