Talk:Letocetum

GA preparation
I arrived intending to do my first GA review, but I hope that I have done more good by making a fairly substantial edit. In particular I have hoped to clarify the history and what is known of the buildings, and to get everything as close as possible to chronological order. Richard Keatinge (talk) 12:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the addition! I've marked four instances where a sentence/section doesn't appear to be referenced, so if you or the nom can fix that, I see nothing else wrong on the citation front. You may also want to have the article copyedited by someone familiar with British syntax and grammar, and it would be helpful to specify BC/AD or BCE/ACE for the years with under four digits. --Gyrobo (talk) 19:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Bad use of CE or AD dates throughout
It is ridiculous to keep using this when there is no need and no ambiguity. They should be removed except for the first one. Rjdeadly (talk) 16:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

National Trust pilot
Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 19:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)