Talk:LibertyLink

Deletion?
Liberty Link is an important gene, and it should not be deleted as it is notable and thousands of farmers use it.

there was a hangon tag on the page, but it was removed when I added the above text so I don't know what was going on. This article shouldn't be deleted.


 * There is currently no attempt to delete the article. As a result, there is no need for a hangon tag. There are of course, no future guarantees, but assuming the recently-added article's references are verifiable (they seem okay to me), the article should be around for some time to come. On behalf of the Wikipedia community, thanks for the contribution. Truthanado (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree, I am trying to make the page title LibertyLink as the title. This page should be deleted and Liberty Link should be redirected.Jasonanaggie (talk) 02:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on LibertyLink (gene). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090101024604/http://www.kemi.se/templates/News____5415.aspx to http://www.kemi.se/templates/News____5415.aspx
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090125031216/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/066-45937-012-01-03-911-20090112IPR45936-12-01-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm to http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/066-45937-012-01-03-911-20090112IPR45936-12-01-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)