Talk:Lily van Java/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 05:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll take this one. Cheers, TBrandley 05:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Though the article is small, because its lost, its still pretty solid. That's all above. On hold for now. TBrandley 02:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Infobox: Add actors per production section
 * Not done exactly as you suggested, but noted
 * Lede: film. En-dash should be em-dash after that "film"
 * Either is acceptable, per WP:MDASH.
 * Lede: "Details on its cast and performance are contradictory, although the film is recognised as the first of a long series of ethnic Chinese-produced films in the country". Any reference?
 * In #Release and reception, but I'll cite as well.
 * Lede: "It is likely lost." → "It is likely a lost film."
 * Done
 * Premise: Wow, very small. Any way of expanding?
 * I'll take another look, but I don't have high hopes. Pareh had the same issue.
 * Nothing in Biran or Said; Biran just adds "the film had a simple story and showed a lot of tennis" and Said quotes an earlier work by Biran which says the same thing.
 * Production: Missing comma before "respectively"
 * Done.
 * Production: "General Motors" is missing "(GM)" at the end, as per MOS:ACRO
 * Not done, as the acronym is not actually used.
 * References: "Footnotes" and "Bibliography" should be actual sub-sections per MOS:ACCESS.
 * Done.
 * OK. This article looks good. It'll pass. Congrats. TBrandley 14:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)