Talk:Lina Khan

/* Amazon's Antitrust Paradox */ Predatory Pricing
I am leaving this link here. It is the classic criticism of her work, but unfortunately in blog post form, so apparently not appropriate as a reference here, but if it was ever referenced in a third party source it would be good to include.

Here is the text I wrote to accompany it:


 * In a 2019 article Kristian Stout and Alec Stapp argued that Khan made a number of mistakes; contrary to her suggestion that Amazon relied on raising financing from investors to support predatory pricing, the firm had actually been cashflow-positive since 2002, and not issued any equity or debt.[5]

Citation links are not broken
Hey Sandstein, I don't understand your comments about broken links. Both these links work just fine for me:


 * https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1964/
 * https://arizonastatelawjournal.org/2019/05/07/requiem-for-a-paradox-the-dubious-rise-and-inevitable-fall-of-hipster-antitrust/

It's not just me - I notice this was previously pointed out on your talk page also, and I can verify the links on downforeveryoneorjustme

Is it possible you have an out of date browser, or an add-on or VPN that blocks some websites? Or maybe your geography restricts access?

If it helps, here are some alternative links to the same content:


 * https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol94/iss2/3/
 * https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2966&context=faculty_scholarship
 * https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3249524
 * https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2018/10/15/the-dubious-rise-and-inevitable-fall-of-hipster-antitrust/

Larklight (talk) 14:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Just to comment on one part of the edit in question--linking to two academics responses to the paper and then saying "Many academics have criticised this work" is original synthesis. Alyo  (chat·edits) 14:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , agreed.  Sandstein   14:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks, the links do work, I was clicking on them in the diff, where they did not because of treiling ref tags. But you should format such references properly, see Template:Journal.  Sandstein   14:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Open Markets Institute
New America CEO Slaughter disputed the reason for booting the Open Markets Institute (OMI) ( Sheelah Kohatkar, "The Enforcer,"The New Yorker, September 6, 2021, pp. 48-57, p. 54). Khan and others re-established OMI outside of New America (ibid.). Kdammers (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)