Talk:Linda Sánchez/Archive 1

Are honorifics allowed in the infobox?
I need to look that up. . .--Morenooso (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just got my answer from another article I follow. Please see: WP:Honorifics. It reads should and is usually followed. I will leave it up to another editor to remove this if desired. --Morenooso (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)--Morenooso (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Issue Positions
I added the issue positions topic using well-research information. All the side-issues posted are inferred by highly researched factors (such as public statements, legislation votes, etc). However, the representative refuses to officially say her issue positions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfernandezantelo (talk • contribs) 15:39, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Linda Sánchez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081013082230/http://www.publishersweekly.com:80/article/CA6567674.html to http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6567674.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Linda Sánchez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051128030356/http://www.lindasanchez.house.gov/index.cfm?section=news&article=2005_10_7_4500 to http://www.lindasanchez.house.gov/index.cfm?section=news&article=2005_10_7_4500
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051128025920/http://www.lindasanchez.house.gov/index.cfm?section=news&article=2005_10_27_4535 to http://www.lindasanchez.house.gov/index.cfm?section=news&article=2005_10_27_4535
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615012523/http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/050809-bullying-bill.html?hpg1=bn to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/050809-bullying-bill.html?hpg1=bn
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100615060239/http://clas.berkeley.edu/Events/fall2008/11-12-08-sanchez/index.html to http://clas.berkeley.edu/Events/fall2008/11-12-08-sanchez/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Person of color
"She is the first woman of color...": I added the link to Person of color, but neither that article nor White Americans nor White Hispanic and Latino Americans settles the issue of what a POC is or which Hispanics are considered POCs, IMO. Has she publicly called herself a POC (or white)? If not, can we avoid this whole can of worms by rewording or simply omitting this sentence? Peter Chastain  [¡hablá!]  06:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * OK, I just read farther down (in Works), where Publishers Weekly calls her a POC. I'm still not convinced that this binary racial classification is a useful part of our lede.  Peter Chastain   [¡hablá!]  06:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Martial status
it is unclear from your summaries why you are removing sourced information. Are you claiming this person was never married? If their marital status has simply changed, then you should just add the new information and cite a reliable source.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 22:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)