Talk:List of European stock exchanges

Russia
Russian markets have unified into a single Moscow Exchange (see www.moex.com). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.163.9.39 (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Question
Where does Virt-X fit in with this list? what is dax, ftse, cac? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.178.163.229 (talk) 07:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

See also section
Hi, at the moment the see also section seems a bit long. Under the link List of stock exchanges you can find links to all the other continental lists of stock exchanges. Thus there is no important need to list all of them separatly here. ("Purity" = focus on the main important links.)

''The links in the "See also" section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number. As a general rule the "See also" section should not repeat links which appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes. Thus, many high-quality, comprehensive articles do not have a "See also" section.'' (citation from here)

--W like wiki (talk) 00:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi W like Wiki;

I fail to see how the "See also section" could be considered to be "long". Please elaborate. Thank you.

KazLabz (talk) 00:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Kevin, sure, I can try a conclusion: The link List of stock exchanges should be enough. The other links to all the continental lists you can find there. (For more details please read my posting above.) --W like wiki (talk) 00:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The articles are much cleaner and the "See Also" sections are more succinct. Thanks for consolidating the links.   --Slazenger  (Contact Me) 00:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Slazenger, thx, did I understand you correct or did you mean this version? --W like wiki (talk) 00:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * W, I was referring to your edit to consolidate them into just one "List of Stock Exchanges". Sorry I didn't embellish upon that. There's no reason in my opinion to have more than that...it just causes unnecessary clutter!  --Slazenger  (Contact Me) 02:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I see. So until now there is no argument against cleaning up the See also section. So I can do my edit again. --W like wiki (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)