Talk:List of stars with proplyds

excised Cha 110913-773444
I've excised Cha 110913-773444 because it is too small to be even a brown dwarf. 132.205.44.5 00:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Color needed in Page
The tables are bland, and need to look like the tables seen on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unconfirmed_extrasolar_planets Deoxy99 (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll be working on that. Synthetical connections  ( talk ) 04:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I got it. Synthetical connections  ( talk ) 04:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Tables
I think the extremes is unneeded, and it seems to just take up more space on a page that is way under construction. It seems that no one with good knowledge to color the tables have been here, let alone anyone else who know enough about wikipedia to request it be colored (like deoxy).

Also, I think that we should merge some of the tables (if not all) and color code them by type. Synthetical connections ( talk ) 04:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

I think the whole table section is unnecessary. It also shouldn't be labelled as lists when it's clearly not a list, even if it actually contained actual information in the table. These two sections labelled as lists could easily be put into the main body of the article (labelled as table xy) or even just written out in a sentence. In its current form its rather sloppy and among the kinds of things that make Wikipedia a hillbilly source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.10.247 (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Debris Discs ≠ Protoplanetary Discs
I've removed a number of systems from this list that are actually debris discs rather than protoplanetary discs. I'm afraid I don't enough about proplyds to add any to the list. This leaves the list rather empty and to be honest I'm not sure there's much point in this page at all. Perhaps it should just be deleted. AstroMark (talk) 23:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC)