Talk:Little Red Lighthouse

Name
shouldn't the title be Jeffrey Hook lighthouse (the official name)? Daveisland (talk) 02:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Per WP:NAME: "Use names and terms most commonly used, and so most likely to be recognized, for the topic of the article." --agr (talk) 17:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

New Image
I propose the use of this new image, covering both the lighthouse and the bridge, but I leave that to the criterion of the native editors. A very nice picture.--JotaCartas (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Little Red Lighthouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101230182234/http://www.washington-heights.us/history/archives/little_red_lighthouse_46.html to http://www.washington-heights.us/history/archives/little_red_lighthouse_46.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120926191146/http://www.historichousetrust.org/item.php?i_id=24 to http://www.historichousetrust.org/item.php?i_id=24

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Relevance of the proposal
I am not sure of the importance of the proposal and the level of detail present in the story of the proposal. I personally don't think it has a great relevance to the lighthouse, but if it is to remain it requires rewriting in the correct tone of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robrobrob2 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Infobox
why did you revert my change to the infobox? I spent quite a long time making sure that all the data was preserved. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Little Red Lighthouse, Fort Washington Park.jpg is pretty inarguably a better image.Filetime (talk) 16:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, yes I agree! Was that the only issue? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. Feel free to put the other content back. Filetime (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)