Talk:Lo's Diary

notable
does an unreferenced article with nothing before an appearance in a book review warrant a page? This could be put on the Lolita page and expanded within just 1 paragraph (where it already is)Lihaas (talk) 11:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi there, I have added citations to reference the article. I think what makes "Lo's Diary" so interesting isn't the actual story, rather it's the dialogue it generated in relation to what the law of copyright defines as a "derivative work". This page doesn't contain a section about this debate, nor the lawsuit Dmitri Nabokov threatened to bring against the author and the publishing house, and how this issue was resolved. (Although the references I have used in this article do contain this information). I think this page needs to be expanded to include sections about these issues. What do other people think?Jihadcola (talk) 02:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Jihadcola

It is evident that neither the writer of the article nor a greedy son without any talent like Dimitri have read even a line of Pia Pera's remake (Lucca, Italy, 1956-2016). The novel, a refined look of the female and adolescent part of the story of Sally \ Dolores, is published in Italy by Marsilio. In the 20s of the new millennium, after the Epstein affair, Pia Pera's remake takes on a whole new aesthetic as well as psychological value (Pardofornaciari, Italia)