Talk:Look for the Light/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 06:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I'll take this review Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I'll be awaiting your responses. Shouldn't take too much work. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Spot checks
Numbers from this revision .Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 16 Good
 * 25 Good
 * 28 Good
 * 32 Good
 * 33 Good
 * 39 Good
 * 46 Good

Drive by comment
It has been three weeks since your last edit on this page. Do you plan to continue the review or should it be closed so the article can wait for a different reviewer? --  Zoo Blazer  19:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh sorry I completely forgot, I'll get on with it. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. To clarify your concerns: Den of Geek's Boo is a little repetitious but I believe it would be inconsistent and potentially confusing to rephrase, and the two uses are far apart anyway; EverythingGP is a local Grande Prairie publication, used here to verify uncontroversial production information; and there are several negative/critical comments in the Reception section, especially the last paragraph. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. – Rhain  ☔ (he/him) 23:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I see the scattered negative thoughts. Upon looking through the sources it seems that you've taken as much as you can from the reviews. I specificlly called out Den of Geek at random, regardless I see your point. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)