Talk:Lorcainide

Citation style
The reference list in this article may prove a bit difficult to maintain in the long run, since it all has to be updated manually. I propose moving it to WP:List-defined references using standard footnotes. That will keep the bulky part of the citations out of the text, but permit automatic numbering. Does anyone object? WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd support that proposal. The use of templates for citations simplifies the use of tools to spot errors and makes maintenance and updating easier and LDRs make the wikitext in a well-referenced article much more readable. --RexxS (talk) 22:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Negative Data, Publication Bias, and 100,000 Deaths Controversy
Um... conspiracy isn't my thing, but is there any reason the very well published controversy involving publication bias, hidden data, and over 100,000 deaths related to Lorcainide is not mentioned in this article? Joel S Bateman (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Synthesis discrepancy
The final step of the synthesis depicts alkylation of the piperidine ring using isopropylamine, whereas the text says it uses isopropyl bromide. This is a discrepancy that should be addressed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:184:4200:6AAB:FD9E:25A3:8C18:A94F (talk) 16:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)