Talk:Lorica plumata

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lorica plumata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130202021512/http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat.html?func=view&catid=17&id=160220 to http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat.html?func=view&catid=17&id=160220

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Is the Roman Army Talk Forum Really a Reliable Source?
One of the sources for the article is a thread from the Roman Army Talk Forum? Should we really be trusting random people on the internet to be a reliable source on information? I read parts of the thread and they don't even talk about the Lorica Plumata. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewf9h-bg (talk • contribs) 01:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Definitely not. GPinkerton (talk) 11:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, Ill remove it. Ewf9h-bg (talk —Preceding undated comment added 13:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Broken link
https://www.academia.edu/download/53789677/Wijnhoven_-_The_Ouddorp_Lorica.pdf

It's not on the wayback machine and I have no idea where to find another freely available copy 79.41.225.41 (talk) 10:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)