Talk:Lovely Muco

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/lovely-muco/gn-1/.197969

Baka-Updates[edit]

You need a better source than a website literally called "idiot-updates" to assert that the character is one breed or another, no matter what your comment line in the article code says. I'll give you a few days, but if you can't find one, I'm going to edit it to say "dog" until someone comes up with a direct source from the mangaka or anime production company to clarify what breed she is. 67.0.64.212 (talk) 07:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An official source doesn't need to be found if there's weight in the evidence. The issue seems to have arrived with Muco not "looking like" an Akita, but Arthur did not look like an aardvark. '''tAD''' (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because Baka-Updates is both based on user generated content and promotes copyright violations, it cannot be used as a source. Why it slipped threw the normal filters, I don't know how. —Farix (t | c) 19:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible circular reference[edit]

The date of Italian article claiming that the dog character is an Akita is September 13, 2015. The date of this article when the character was identified as an Akita is June 27, 2015‎. That means that there is a strong potential for the Italian source to be a circular reference. Also, the Japanese version of the article calls the breed Shiba Inu, even though that is not sourced in that article either. —Farix (t | c) 20:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]