Talk:Low-frequency oscillation

Image
That image corresponds to anything but a modern synthesizer. The control panel, the knob and buttons are very vintage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.80.58.84 (talk) 07:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Self-Referential
"The abbreviation is also very often used to refer to low-frequency oscillators themselves, which produce the effects explored in this article." This has to be against the style guidelines, right? 70.161.101.249 00:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

samples
"Such effects are difficult to describe, and are more understandable when heard." so some samples of different effects would surely be useful and not too hard to produce? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.167.107.251 (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Dubstep
I added a section in "uses" about the usage of LFOs to make wobble bass in Dubstep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.33.151.78 (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Oscillation vs. oscillator
In my experience, it is much more common for LFO to refer to the oscillator than to the oscillation that it produces. Looks like there was at one point a move from Low-frequency oscillator to Low-frequency oscillation but I can find no discussion related to that. Perhaps someone would like to fill me in on the history here. --Kvng (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That is my experience as well. If no one objects, and soon, I'd like to move this back to Low-frequency oscillator . __ Just plain Bill (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)