Talk:Luke Nightingale

Untitled
Made vast improvements Dean randall 19:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Needs reliable sources
, www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com, a subdomain of newcastlefans.com, appears to be a self-published source that may lack the required reliability for a valid BLPPROD objection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It's widely regarded as a reliable source and is used on thousands of Wikipedia articles (you can check this by the number of transclusions of NeilBrownPlayers, which is often used to link to the site). You can also see that it is regularly used in discussions at WT:FOOTY. Feel free to bring the matter up there if you need further reassurance. Number   5  7  16:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks, I wasn't aware of this. Even the template description itself, though, seems to recommend it for the "external links section" of articles. A quick look at a few of the transclusions seems to confirm this view. Just like IMDb, it may lack the required reliability to be used as a source while still being a valid external link for thousands of Wikipedia articles. My concern remains, for this specific article and the specific citation done here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The source is fine but I don't have time to waste arguing about this so I've just replaced it with another one. Next time, rather than wasting other editors' time like this, please just find a source yourself – it took all of five seconds to find something on Nightingale on Google. Number   5  7  16:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)