Talk:Luna Pier, Michigan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

I have merged the article Luna Pier into this one. aliceinlampyland 15:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

City officials[edit]

I removed the city officials information, per WP:USCITY, WP:N, and WP:NOTNEWS. WP:USCITY is a guideline establishe by the cities Wikiproject to help work towards consistent data in city articles. Wikipedia is not the government hosting site for Luna Pier, that information already exists in the city's own website, which is already linked to from the article. The reason given for adding it back was "Deleting city officials while maintaining restaurant names does not provide definitive data." Just because other material which does not belong in the article exists does not justify adding this content back. I've re-removed the material as well as having removed the additional problematic content which was pointed out. In addition, I've also fixed the external links content to follow WP:USCITY, WP:ELNO, and WP:NOT#REPOSITORY. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 02:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luna Pier, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]